检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350108 [2]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361000
出 处:《石家庄经济学院学报》2014年第5期116-119,共4页Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
摘 要:近年以来,国家发改委对国内纵向垄断协议作出了调查并开出了巨额罚单,从2013年的"茅台案""洋奶粉垄断案"到如今沸沸扬扬的"奥迪罚单或达18亿,创中国反纵向垄断罚金最高纪录"的推测。纵向垄断协议引起了社会各界的广泛关注,纵向垄断协议的核心问题"纵向垄断协议的认定"也成为经济法的研究热点,从中国纵向垄断协议的认定原则作为切入点,以中国首例纵向垄断协议纠纷案强生案为例深入剖析纵向垄断协议的具体认定方法。In recent years, the national development and Reform Commission do a lot of vertical monopoly agreements research and made huge fines, from the 2013 " maotai case" ," foreign milk monopoly case" until the "audi will probably pay 18 Billion fine which will make the highest record in antimonopoly fine Chinese speculation". The vertical monopoly agreement has aroused widespread concern in the community, the vertical monopoly agreement " the core issue of the vertical monopoly agreement that the economic law" has also become a research hot spot, the principle of Chinese vertical monopoly agreements as a starting point, specific identification method on disputes in the first vertical monopoly agreement Chinese case Johnson case in depth analysis of longitudinal monopoly agreements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222