检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋军[1] 张迎东[1] 许腾[1] 徐溢新[1] 宋虎[1] 符炜[1] 樊瑞智 徐为[1]
机构地区:[1]徐州医学院附属医院胃肠外科,江苏徐州221002
出 处:《徐州医学院学报》2014年第10期669-671,共3页Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
摘 要:目的探讨60岁以上老年人腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的安全性和可行性。方法对行直肠癌根治术的92例60岁以上老年患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(36例)和开腹组(56例),对比分析2组手术情况、术后恢复情况和术后并发症。结果2组均无围术期死亡病例。腹腔镜组术中出血量、切口长度、排气时间、住院时间、手术并发症发生率与开腹组的差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),手术时间及淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论60岁以上老年人腹腔镜直肠癌根治术创伤小,术后恢复快,近期疗效好,是安全可行的手术方式。Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopy and open radical resection for patients older than 60 years with rectal neoplasms. Methods A total of 92 patients aged older than 60 years who had undergone radical resection for rectal neoplasms between January 2011 and December 2013 at our hospital. The patients were assigned to laparoscopic group (n = 36) and open group ( n = 56). The operation safety, postoperative recovery, and post- operative complications were compared between the two operative styles. Results No surgery - related death occurred in the two group. The blood loss, length of the incision, returning to bowel function, hospital stay and operative complica- tions for laparoscopic group were less than open group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The operating time and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes had no significant difference between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that laparoscopic radical resection for patients older than 60 years is safe and feasible, with its good short - time result and advantage of minimal invasiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229