检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江财经大学财政与公共管理学院 [2]浙江财经大学
出 处:《经济社会体制比较》2014年第6期135-147,共13页Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基 金:教育部重大攻关课题"促进经济发展方式转变的地方财税体制改革研究"(项目编号:12JZD032)
摘 要:基于1994~2010年30个省(市、自治区)的收入预算执行情况,文章发现“我国地方政府收入预算科学性整体偏低”,“低估政府收入具有普遍性”,“偏差率在东中西部变化趋势基本相同,但有一定扩大趋势”等特点。其中原因既与技术层面的落后有关,更有制度层面的缺陷,特别是与超收资金管理制度、政府官员考核晋升制度有关。基于此,文章建议将收入预算与收入预测相分离,政府购买收入预测服务;将超收资金全部纳入预算内管理;将政府官员考核重点由GDP增长率转向“市场不能干,市场干不好”的地方。Based on the 1994~2010 local revenue budget performance, this paper discusses how scientific local government revenue budgets are. It has the following characteristics: they are not so scientific as a whole, local government revenue is underestimated, the relation with the economic cycle is not significant, and the gap between the deviation in eastern region and those in other areas is widening. The main reasons are technical im- perfections and institutional flaws, especially "greater discretion" in budgetary surplus funds and "more empha- sis on GDP growth in the government official assessment". To make local government revenue budget, we suggest that the revenue projection and revenue budget be separated, governments purchase revenue forecasting services, all government funds be incorporated into budgets, and the assessment of government officials focus on how they have done in areas "the market cannot do or cannot do well".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249