检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宜宾市第一人民医院检验科,四川宜宾644000
出 处:《国际检验医学杂志》2014年第21期2939-2940,共2页International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的比较时间分辨荧光免疫分析技术(TRFIA)和ELISA法在检测HBV血清学标志物的价值。方法分别采用TRFIA和ELISA法检测359例低浓度乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)标本的HBV血清学标志物,比较两种方法的检测结果的差异。结果TRFIA法检测HBV血清学标志物的各项结果阳性率均高于ELISA法,HBsAg、乙肝e抗原(HBeAg)和乙肝核心抗体(HBcAb)阳性率结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而乙肝表面抗体(HBsAb)、乙肝e抗体(HBeAb)阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与ELISA法相比,TRFIA在检测含有低浓度HBsAg标本时具有更高的灵敏度,具有良好的临床应用价值。Objective To compare the value of time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay(TRFIA)and ELISA for the detection of HBV serological markers.Methods To detect the HBV serological markers in 359 samples with low concentrations of HBsAg by TRFIA and ELISA respectively,and to compare the results of the two methods.Results The levels of HBV serological markers detected by TRFIA were higher than those detected by ELISA.The positive rates of HBsAg,HBeAg and HBcAb detected by TRFIA and ELISA were significantly different(P〈0.05),while those of HBsAb and HBeAb were not(P〉0.05).Conclusion Compared with ELISA,TRFIA has higher sensitivity in the detection of low HBsAg concentration samples,and it is valuable to be applicated in clinical.
关 键 词:时间分辨荧光免疫分析技术 酶联免疫吸附试验 乙肝表面抗原 血清学标志物
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117