检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段文军[1] 于庆波[1] 秦勤[1] 侯丽敏[1]
机构地区:[1]东北大学材料与冶金学院,辽宁沈阳110819
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2014年第11期1565-1569,共5页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51274066);国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAA03B03)
摘 要:采用焓-火用图热力学分析方法对不同高炉渣余热回收模式进行分析,对物理法回收余热生产热水和水蒸气,不同化学反应的化学法回收余热的焓效率和火用效率进行计算和对比分析.结果表明:物理法回收余热生产热水和生产蒸气的焓效率相同,都为76.9%,而火用效率分别为14.4%,34.2%;利用化学法回收余热的焓效率高达92.2%,火用效率为60%左右,二者均高于物理法;利用C-CO2的煤气化反应对高炉渣余热进行回收时,每吨渣可以消耗165 kg的CO2,有利于钢铁企业实现节能目标.The heat recovery efficiency of different BF slag waste heat recovery systems were analyzed by using enthalpy-exergy diagram. Enthalpy and exergy efficiency were calculated and compared by physical recovery method to produce hot water or steam and chemical recovery method by endothermic reactions of decomposition of limestone, coal gasification, methane reforming. The results showed that the heat efficiency of applying the waste heat of BF slag to produce hot water is 76.9% , equal to that of producing steam. While the enthalpy efficiency of the two is different, the former is 14. 4% , and the later is 34.2%. The heat efficiency of chemical reaction with BF slag is as high as 92.2% , while the enthalpy efficiency is 62.7%. Both are higher than those of physical heat recovery method. Applying the coal gasification to recover the waste heat of BF slag can absorb 165 kg per tone of slag, which attribute to realize the goal of energy conservation and slow down the greenhouse effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30