检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学土木工程系,北京100084 [2]清华大学土木工程安全与耐久教育部重点实验室,北京100084
出 处:《岩土力学》2014年第11期3289-3297,共9页Rock and Soil Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(No.41272280);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.51038007);清华大学自主科研计划项目(No.2012THZ02-2);教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金课题(2010年)
摘 要:整体式桥是一种新的桥型,能够极大地节省长期维护和运营费用,值得在国内大力推广应用,但目前对整体式桥台在地震作用下的动力反应还很缺乏认识。通过对典型的单跨整体式桥台的地震反应进行动力数值模拟,分析了地震加速度峰值、桥台高度、桥梁跨度等主要因素的影响及其机理,并探讨了桥台后增加柔性隔离层及采用加筋土这两种措施的减震效果。结果表明,目前桥台抗震规范采用的M-O方法不能合理地描述整体式桥台后动土压力的大小和分布,其预测结果偏不安全;柔性隔离层虽然可以减小桥台后的动土压力,但同时也会导致较大的桥台变形和弯矩;填土中加筋能够提供水平拉力,可以有效减小地震作用下桥台的最大弯矩和水平位移。As a new bridge type, integral bridge can significantly reduce the long term maintenance cost, and its application should be encouraged in China. However, there is great uncertainty about the dynamic performance of integral abutments during earthquake. This paper presents the findings from a dynamic numerical simulation about a typical integral bridge. The influence of seismic peak acceleration, abutment height, and bridge deck length has been investigated. The effects of two mitigation methods, e.g. installation of a flexible layer and reinforced soil behind the abutment, have also been discussed. The results show that the traditional M-O method adopted in the current bridge abutment design code cannot give a reasonable prediction about the dynamic earth pressure behind integral abutment, which would lead to an unsafe design. Although a flexible layer can reduce the earth pressure, the deformation and bending moments will increase. Reinforcement can provide horizontal tensile forces to the abutment, leading to reduce abutment deformation and bending moments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28