检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王静[1] 唐小丽[1] 顾琼[1] 陈晓琴[1] 姜淑[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省肿瘤医院肝胆胃肠外科,成都610041
出 处:《肿瘤预防与治疗》2014年第5期239-242,共4页Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
基 金:2013年四川省卫生厅科研课题;项目编号:130222
摘 要:目的:评价规范化疼痛管理在上腹部术后患者临床应用中的效果。方法:将160例患者随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用传统的术后疼痛干预,观察组实施规范化疼痛管理,比较对两组患者手术镇痛认知度的影响、术后3d疼痛控制效果、术后生理功能恢复方面的指标。结果:观察组对疼痛知识的认知程度明显高于对照组,术后3d疼痛分值明显低于对照组,睡眠时间多于对照组,肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均明显少于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:规范化疼痛管理改变了患者错误的疼痛认知,有效提高开腹术后的镇痛效果,促进患者康复。Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of standardlized pain management in the patients who had accepted upper abdominal surgery. Methods:One hundred and sixty patients were randomly allocated into the control group and observation group. Patients in the control group underwent the conventional postoperative pain management, whereas patients in the observation group accepted the standardized postoperative pain management. The awareness of analgesia, pain control effect on 3 days after surgery and status of physiological function recovery were compared between these two groups. Re- suits:Compared with the control group, awareness of analgesia in the observation group was significantly higher, however, pain scores were significantly lower. In addition, patients in the observation group had longer sleep time, shorter time to flatus and out-of-bed activity, lower incidence of complication and shorter hospitalization time than those in the control group. The differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion : Standardized pain management can alter patients' awareness of analgesia, effectively improve the analgesic effect after abdominal surgery, and promote the rehabilitation of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145