检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2014年第21期73-75,共3页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的观察砭石热熨背部辅助治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法对我科2011年1月至2011年10月收治的支气管哮喘患者共60例采用随机分组的方法,分为实验组及对照组,实验组30例采用西医常规治疗加砭石热熨背部辅助治疗,对照组30例采用西医常规治疗。结果临床总有效率实验组93.33%,对照组73.33%;实验组肺通气功能指标的改善、血清免疫球蛋白Ig E、PEF、PEF变异率与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义。(P驥0.05)。结论采用砭石热熨背部辅助治疗支气管哮喘的中西医结合疗法效果较单纯西医常规治疗效果显著,有临床意义。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of stone needle back-heating therapy as an adjuvant treatment of bronchial asthma.Methods From January 2011 to October 2011, using the method of randomization, 60 bronchial asthma patients in our department were equally divided into experiment and control groups. Patients in experiment group were treated by conventional western medicine plus ad-juvant stone needle back-heating therapy, patients in control group were treated by conventional western medicine therapy. Results The total clinical effective rates of experiment group and control group were 93.33 % and 73.33%, respectively. Improvements in pulmonary function index, serum immunoglobulin Ig E, PEF and PEF variation rate in experiment group were statistically more significant than in control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Using stone needle back-heating as an adjuvant treatment, integrative therapy has a more remark-able and significant effect on bronchial asthma than a simple conventional western medicine therapy does.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.27.20