检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李胜[1] 韩萍[2] 邹文远[1] 侯明伟[1] 葛鹏[1] 徐官珍[1] 陈思[1] 刘源源[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属人民医院放射科,湖北十堰442000 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院放射科,湖北武汉430022
出 处:《湖北医药学院学报》2014年第5期437-440,共4页Journal of Hubei University of Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨外伤性肘关节脂肪垫征与桡骨头骨折的相关性。方法:从96例病例中收集46例肘关节外伤后肘关节脂肪垫征阳性患者的CR、CT及临床资料。按临床最终诊断有无桡骨头骨折分为病例组(25例)和对照组(21例)。病例组均为单纯性桡骨头骨折病例,按桡骨头骨折Mason分型分为"Ⅰ型组"(15例)和"其他类型组"(10例)。分别测量两组病例的肘前脂肪垫(anterior fat pad,AFP)和肘后脂肪垫(posterior fat pad,PFP)的最大厚度,并进行统计学分析。结果:病例组AFP、PFP厚度分别为(12.40±1.80)mm、(10.10±2.47)mm,对照组分别为(5.36±1.54)mm、(4.08±0.92)mm,两组间AFP和PFP厚度有显著性差异(P〈0.01);桡骨头骨折MasonⅠ型组AFP、PFP厚度分别为(12.38±1.44)mm、(5.66±1.56)mm,其他类型组分别为(12.42±3.32)mm、(4.90±1.48)mm,两组间AFP和PFP厚度差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);AFP、PFP厚度对桡骨头骨折诊断的准确度A分别为0.775、0.757时具有一定的准确性(P〈0.05),两指标A的95%CI分别为(0.641-0.910)、(0.618-0.896)。结论:外伤性脂肪垫征与桡骨头骨折存在一定的相关性,肘部脂肪垫厚度值越大桡骨头骨折的可能性愈大;但脂肪垫的厚度对区分桡骨头骨折类型无指导价值。Objective To explore the correlation between traumatic fat pad sign and radial head fracture in adults. Methods The CR,CT and clinical data of 46 cases with positive fat pad sign were collected from 96 patients with elbow joint trauma.The 46 cases were divided into cases group( n = 25) and control group( n = 21) according to the clinical final diagnosis of with or without fracture at radial head. The patients in cases group,which were diagnosed with simple fracture,were divided into type Ⅰ subgroup( n = 15) and other types subgroup( n = 10) according to Mason classification. The maximum thickness of anterior fat pad( AFP) and posterior fat pad( PFP) were measured and statistically analyzed. Results The thickness of AFP and PFP in cases group were( 12. 40 ± 1. 80) mm and( 10. 10 ± 2. 47) mm,while the thickness of AFP and PFP in control group were( 5. 36 ± 1. 54) mm and( 4. 08 ± 0. 92) mm,respectively. The thickness of AFP and PFP were obvious difference between two groups( P〈 0. 01). The thickness of AFP and PFP of type Ⅰ subgroup were( 12. 38 ± 1. 44) mm and( 5. 66 ± 1. 56) mm,while the thickness of AFP and PFP of other types subgroup were( 12. 42 ± 3. 32) mm and( 4. 90± 1. 48) mm,respectively. The thickness of AFP and PFP had no significant difference between two subgroups( P〉0. 05).According to the ROC curve analysis,the accuracy A of diagnosis of radial head fracture were 0. 775,0. 757( P〈0. 05),and 95% CI of the above two A were( 0. 641 - 0. 910),( 0. 618 - 0. 896). Conclusion The sign of traumatic fat pad sign may correlate with radial head fractures in adults,the thicker of the elbow fat pad was more beneficial to the diagnosis of radial head fractures,however the changes of the elbow fat pad did not provide valuable help for distinguish the type of radial head fractures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30