理解危机与变革的三种视角及其超越  

Three Perspectives to Understand Crisis and Change and Beyond

作　　者：张春满[1] 

机构地区：[1]美国约翰霍普金斯大学政治学

出　　处：《社会主义研究》2014年第6期98-104,共7页Socialism Studies

摘　　要：危机与变革是整个社会科学的核心研究议题之一,西方学界主要从制度主义、结构主义和过程主义三种视角来进行分析。在解释制度变革方面,理性选择学派和权力学派占据主要位置。结构主义视角对解释宏观发展效果很好。过程主义分析结合了宏观和微观的分析因素。这三者视角尽管产生了丰硕的成果,但是也具有很强的局限性。战略行为场域理论试图把制度、结构和过程结合起来,从而提供更加全面的分析。这些研究视角对我国的社会科学研究很有帮助,需要我们努力学习和批评借鉴。同时,我们也要有理论自信,相信我们也能发展出更好的研究视角,来分析中国和解释中国。Crisis and change are the main study field in the whole social sciences. Western scholars study them from perspectives of institution, structure and process. In terms of explaining institutional change, rational choice and power schools are the main camps. Structural perspective can do a better job in accounting for macro development. The process perspective combines the macro and micro analyses. Even though these three perspectives have yielded substantial fruits, they have their own limitations. Strategic action fields theory attempts to combine them together in order to provide more comprehensive analysis. These approaches are all very helpful for China's social science research, and we need to critically learn and use them. Meanwhile, we should have theory confidence and believe that we can develop better perspectives to analyze and explain China.

关 键 词：危机 变革 制度 结构 过程 

分 类 号：C913.7[经济管理]