机构地区:[1]首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院儿科,100020
出 处:《中华实用儿科临床杂志》2014年第21期1635-1639,共5页Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
摘 要:目的观察川崎痫(KD)患儿大剂量静脉注射用丙种球蛋白(IVIG)的治疗效果,分析血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF—α)、叮溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体-1(sTNFR1)的变化,为IVIG无反应型KD患儿的治疗提供依据。方法选择发病10d内接受IVIG标准治疗的KD患儿83例,比较IVIG无反应组与敏感组患儿间血清TNF-α、sTNFR1水平的差异。同时选取健康对照儿童33例,比较其与KD患儿间的差异。结果1.IVIG无反应组[45.4%(5/11例)]患儿出现冠状动脉损害(CALs)高于敏感组[33.3%(24/72例)],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。2.治疗前,11例IVIG无反应组KD患儿血清TNF—α水平[(190.7±125.4)ng/L]高于72例敏感组患儿[(104.2±95.5)ng/L]及健康对照儿童[(19.0±8.3)ng/L],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);治疗后,IVIG无反应组TNF—α水平[(68.8±49.5)ng/L]仍高于敏感组[(36.8±28.7)ng/L],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);再次IVIG后,IVIG无反应组血清TNF—α水平接近于健康对照组,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。3.健康对照组儿童血清sTNFR1为(5.4±1.9)μg/L,IVIG无反应组和敏感组治疗前sTNFR1分别为(4.6±1.9)μg/L和(4.7±2.9)μg/L,两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。4.IVIG无反应组5例CALs患儿TNF—α水平[(266.8±117.3)ng/L]高于同组6例无CALs患儿[(126.2±93.7)ng/L],亦高于敏感组24例CALs患儿[(118.8±96.1)ng/L],两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。5.WIG无反应组患儿C反应蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶水平高于敏感组,血红蛋白、清蛋白水平低于敏感组,2组问差异有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。结论KD患儿体内不仅存在TNF-α水平异常升高,还伴发sTNFR1水平异常,IVIG无反应组更明显;IVIG可使TNF-α水平降低,但在无反应组中需要更�Objective To investigate the outcome of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in children with Kawasaki disease ( KD), and to study serum tmnor necrosis factor- α(TNF-α) , soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR1) levels in these patients,and to explore further treatment of IVIG non-responsive. Methods Eighty- three patients with KI) received initial IVIG and aspirin therapy within 10 days. Patients were divided into non-responsive group and sensitive group, while the clinical experiences and the outcome of them were recorded. Thirty-three health children were also recruited in this study, and the levels of serum TNF-α, sTNFR1 in KD patients were compared with health children and within different groups. Results 1. In non-responsive group, the rate of coronary artel3, lesions (CALs) was 45.4% ( 5/11 cases) in non-responsive group, but 33.3% ( 24/72 cases) in sensitive group, there was a statistical difference between them( P 〈 0.05 ). 2. Before therapy, serum TNF-α concentrations of non-responsive group were significantly higher than sensitive group [ ( 190.7 ± 125.4 ) ng/L vs ( 104.2 ± 95.5 ) ng,/L ], so there was a statistical difference between them( P 〈0.05 ). The elevation of TNF-α levels had continually existed in non-responsive group after initial 1VIG therapy[ (68.8 ±49.5) ng/L vs (36.8 ±28.7) ng/L] ,and there was also a statistical difference between non-responsive group and sensitive group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Serum TNF-α concentrations of non-responsive KD patients decreased to (21.2 ± 7.4) ng/L after second IVIG,health children were ( 19.0 ± 8.3 ) ng,/L, so there was no statistical difference between them(P 〉0.05). 3. Serum sTNFR1 concentration was (4.6 ± 1.9) μg/L in non-responsive group, (4.7 ± 2. g) μg/L in sensitive group, (5.4 ± 1.9 ) μg/L in health children, so there was no statistical difference between them( P 〉 0.05 ). 4. In non-responsive group, serum TNF-α contentrations o
关 键 词:川崎病 静脉注射用免疫球蛋白无反应 肿瘤坏死因子-Α 可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体 冠状动脉 损害
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...