检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第6期84-90,136,共8页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:江西省社科"十二五"规划项目"刑法全球化研究"(12FX19)
摘 要:犯罪与刑罚谁决定谁,一直是学术界争论不休的问题。理论体系起点必须具备的要求,以及社会危害性观念存在的缺陷,说明刑法学的逻辑起点只能产生于刑罚目的之中。对犯罪原因的不同理解造成刑罚观念不同,进而导致犯罪观念不同,这已被刑法的演进路径所证明。刑法学派之争缘于刑罚目的观相异,并在犯罪论的理论层面引发了全面的论战。从刑罪关系的点线面考察,刑罚观决定犯罪观。It is an argumentative question in academe whether penal notion determines criminal notion or con- trarily. The logic jumping - off of criminal law can but produce from penal intention, considering the demands of sys- tem info and the limitation of social danger. Different comprehension of reasons of crime leads to different penal no- tion, which makes for different criminal notion. Those have been proved by evolutionary course of criminal law histo- ry. The dispute of criminal law school came of different notion of penal intention, which resulted in all around con- troversy on the theories of criminal idea. The tridimensional review of relationship of penality and crime has authen- ticated a rationale of criminal law that penal notion determines criminal notion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7