司法渎职犯罪罪数判定  

Number Determination of Judicial Dereliction Crime

作　　者：刘阳 

机构地区：[1]湖北省仙桃市人民检察院

出　　处：《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第6期103-107,共5页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：重塑司法渎职犯罪的罪数理论,有利于正确的指引司法实务、贯彻刑法禁止重复评价的原则以及限制法官的自由裁量权。应当以构成要件符合性作为司法渎职犯罪罪数的判断标准,区分罪数判断标准与判断要素,坚持罪刑均衡以及诉讼效率的处断原则。当司法渎职罪法条竞合时,应坚持特别法优于普通法且兼顾重法优于轻法的原则,刑法第247条、第248条应当适用转化犯的规定,刑法第399条第4款,属于例外规定,应严格限定其适用范围。The establishment of judicial dereliction of crime number determination theory, is good for guiding the judicial practice, implementing the principles of prohibit repeat evaluation and limiting the discretion of the judge. The number of criminal judgment standard was the constitutive requirements of conformity, to distinguish the crime number judgment standards and judgment factors, adhere to the principle of balanced fault principle as well as the efficiency of lawsuit. When judicial dereliction crime is overlap of articles, we should adhere to that special law is superior to common law, the principle of weight law is superior to the light law. Article 247, article 248 of the criminal law should belong to transformed crime. Article 399 paragraph 4 of the criminal law is except, the judicial practice shall be limited the scope of application.

关 键 词：司法渎职犯罪 罪数理论 判断标准 法条竞合 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学]