检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张献文[1] 冯凯祥[1] 竹建强[1] 王秋蓉[1] 赵红[1]
机构地区:[1]绵阳市中心医院,四川621000
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2014年第22期3388-3389,3392,共3页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的比较芒硝与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的清洁效果及患者耐受性。方法选择2013年8月至2014年5月该院门诊及住院行结肠镜检查的2 380例患者,按年龄末位数字的单双数进行分组,其中单数者(1 260例)给予精制芒硝做肠道准备(A组),双数者(1 120例)给予复方聚乙二醇电解质散做肠道准备(B组),比较两组肠道清洁效果和患者对清洁剂的耐受性。结果两组患者清洁剂使用后的肠道清洁有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.305 9,P>0.05);A组患者耐受性较B组好,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.766 4,P<0.05)。结论芒硝与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中清洁效果相当,但口服芒硝患者耐受性更好,所需的费用更低。Objective To compare the cleansing effect of Glauber′s salt and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in bowel preparation before colonoscopy and tolerance of patients. Methods A total of 2 380 patients with colonoscopy in outpatient service or hospitalized from August 2013 to May 2014 were selected and grouped according to the numbers of the last figure ,and the patients with odd figure(n=1 260) were given refined Glauber′s salt for bowel preparation(group A),while the patients with even figure(n=1 120) were given polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for bowel preparation(group B). The cleaning effect and toler-ance to the laxatives in the two groups were compared. Results The difference on cleaning effect in the two groups had no statis tical significance(χ2=0.305 9,P〉0.05);the tolerance of the patients in group A was better than that in group B with statistically significant difference(χ2=4.766 4,P〈0.05). Conclusion The cleaning effect of Glauber′s salt was similar to that of polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,but the patients with Glauber′s salt orally have better tolerance with less costs,so compared with polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,Glauber′s salt has more advantages on bowel preparation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28