检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院门诊部,广州510282 [2]南方医科大学,广州510515
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2014年第24期3713-3718,共6页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
基 金:广州市海珠区科技计划项目(2009-Y-018)
摘 要:目的对脊髓损伤患者的日常生活活动能力评定量表(AMS)的信度和效度进行分析。方法选取脊髓损伤患者30例,应用AMS进行康复评定,并进行信度和效度分析。结果AMS具有较好的组内信度、组间信度、表面效度、敏感度,在与FIM、BI对照研究显示具有较好的标准效度。结论日常生活活动能力评定量表(AMS)具有较好的信度和效度,可以在临床上广泛地应用脊髓损伤的康复评定。Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of Activity of Daily Living Measure Scale (AMS) in patients with spinal cord injury. Method 30 patients with spinal cord injury were evaluated with AMS. The reliability and vadility of AMS were analyzed. Results AMS had good inter-group reliability, between-groups reliability, face validity, and sensitivity. It showed that AMS was highly relative with FIM and BI and had good criteria validity. Conclusions AMS has good reliability and validity. It should be generally applied in spinal cord injury assessment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229