中国台湾地区刑事判例制度与大陆案例指导制度之比较  

Comparison between the Criminal Precedent System in Taiwan District and the Case Directing System in China's Mainland

作　　者：刘传稿[1] 王烁[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875 [2]北京化工大学文法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《北京社会科学》2014年第11期106-113,共8页Social Sciences of Beijing

摘　　要：中国台湾地区的刑事判例制度诞生于民国初期,1949年以后在台湾地区的司法实践中继续适用;而案例指导制度则是中国大陆2010年才诞生的司法制度。这两个司法制度都属于中华法系,深受中国传统法文化的影响。因此,两者在案件选择标准、选编程序以及案件影响力等方面均具有相同或相似之处。但由于半个多世纪以来,海峡两岸实行不同的政治、法律制度,因此这两种司法制度在案件来源、选编依据、案件拘束力程度等方面也存在着明显的差异。通过对两种制度的比较研究,既可以深刻了解刑事判例制度在台湾地区司法中的作用,又可以为中国大陆案例指导制度的完善提供相应的经验和借鉴。The criminal precedent system of Taiwan was born in the early period of the Republic of China, and continued to play a role in judicial practice of Taiwan District after 1949. While the case directing system of China's Mainland is a new judicial system born in 2010. Both these two judicial systems are deeply influenced by Chinese traditional law culture and belong to Chinese legal system. They are similar in case selection criteria, procedures and Selected Cases influence, etc. However, there are also significant differences between them such as cases sources, selected basis and the extent of cases binding. Through a comparative study, we could get a deep understanding of the role of criminal precedent in Taiwan District, and acquire some reference for the improving of the case directing system in China's Mainland.

关 键 词：台湾地区 刑事判例制度 大陆 案例指导制度 

分 类 号：DF6[政治法律—刑法学]