从“非洲法系”到“非洲混合法系”——再论非洲法研究中的法系问题  

From “African legal system”to “African mixed legal system”——Further on the Legal System Problem of African Law Research

作　　者：夏新华[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2014年第6期128-136,共9页Journal of Comparative Law

摘　　要：关于非洲法系是否存在与如何划分的问题,曾是学界激烈争论的焦点,但由于理论建构的难度以及非洲法的复杂性,对非洲法系的研究难以突破现有理论局限。然而,随着混合法系理论的成熟和非洲法研究的深入,"非洲混合法系"概念的提出,打破了传统"中西二元"的思维局限,以更加开阔的视野重构非洲法研究的三维空间,既缓和了非洲法系能否独立存在的争议,又解决了非洲法系如何划分的困境,还能为学界进一步探析法系划分理论提供有效的研究思路。The question of whether the African legal system exists and how to classify it was once the focus in academic dispute. Due to the difficulty of theory construction and complexity of African legal system, it is difficult to break through the existing theoretical limitations. With the development of Mixed legal system theory and African legal research, however, the conception of “African mixed legal system” break the limited thinking of “Chinese-western binary”, restructuring the three-dimensional space of African law research with more spacious vision, easing the controversy of whether the African legal system exists independently, solving the problem of how to classify African legal system, and also providing an effective way for further study of legal system classification theory in academia.

关 键 词：法系 非洲法 混合法系 非洲混合法系 

分 类 号：D94[政治法律—法学]