知识产权行政执法偏好与企业创新激励——基于转型期“大调解”机制政策效果的分析  

Administrative Enforcement Preference of Intellectual Property and Firms' Innovation Incentives——An Analysis Based on the “Mediation”Mechanism during Chinese Transition Economy

作　　者：苗妙[1] 魏建[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学经济研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《产业经济研究》2014年第6期102-110,共9页Industrial Economics Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点课题"深化国有文化单位改革和文化管理体制机制改革创新研究"(项目编号:12AZD023)的科研资助

摘　　要：面对技术创新速度加快以及企业知识产权纠纷的增加,我们必须思考转型期"大调解"机制的政策效果。基于知识产权行政执法偏好对企业创新激励这一独特视角,本文考察了知识产权行政执法中处理和调解这两种不同的纠纷解决方式对企业创新激励的不同影响。研究发现地区知识产权侵权纠纷调解方式的倾向有利于增强企业创新激励,同时这一影响因企业控制权性质和企业生命周期两方面的异质性而有所差异。本文不仅从企业创新激励的角度为知识产权纠纷行政执法偏好的选择提供了新的解释,同时也从法和经济学角度深化了知识产权保护对企业创新激励方面的研究,对于我国知识产权纠纷解决的法律实践具有启示意义。Accelerated technological innovation and increased intellectual property disputes make us think of the policy effects of the ＂Mediation＂ mechanism in Chinese transition economy. This paper examines the impact of two different ways of intellectual property disputes resolution on firms＇ innovation incentives from the unique perspective of administrative preference effects on innovation incentives. We find regional mediation tendency of intellectual property disputes enhances firms＇ innovation incentives ,and the impact varies with the heterogeneity of firms caused by the control property and life cycle. The paper not only provides a new explanation of ways to handle intellectual property disputes from the perspective of firms＇ innovation incentives, but also deepens the research of intellectual property protection effects on firms＇ innovation incentives in law and economics. It is also of enlightening relevance to law practice of intellectual property disputes of China.

关 键 词：知识产权纠纷 行政处理 行政调解 企业创新激励 “大调解” 

分 类 号：D922.17[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] F270.3[政治法律—法学]