论刑法中被害人自我答责理论的模糊性  

On the Ambiguity of Victims' Self-Responding to Prosecutien Theory in the Criminal Law

作　　者：何立荣[1,2] 蔡家华[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院 [2]广西民族大学法学院 [3]广西民族大学

出　　处：《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第6期160-164,共5页JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION

摘　　要：被害人自我答责理论模糊性的主要表现:一是被害人自我答责理论的基本内涵不清晰;二是被害人自我答责判断标准不统一;三是被害人自我答责的判断条件缺乏可操作性。发现和正视该理论存在的模糊性是继续完善该理论的首要任务,如果说要继续在中国提倡被害人自我答责理论,就必须继续研究和解决该理论中的各种混乱、不协调。The ambiguity of Self-Responding to Prosecutien Theory of victims exists in the following three aspects： 1. the fundamental connotation of victims Self-Responding to Prosecutien theory is fuzzy; 2. there is no unified criteria in the theory; 3. the condition for judgment lacks maneuverability. It is believed that the top priority to perfect the theory is to find out its ambiguity.Only after the chaos and inconsistence in this theory are solved can it be practiced in China.

关 键 词：被害人 自我答责理论 模糊性 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]