检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省南充市中心医院心胸外科,四川南充637000
出 处:《实用医院临床杂志》2014年第6期165-167,共3页Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨食管-胃胸顶器械吻合法在食管中上段癌手术中的应用价值。方法我院行食管癌手术的247例患者,其中108例采用经上腹正中切口联合右胸切口方法(胸顶器械吻合组),139例采用食管-胃颈部手工吻合(颈部吻合组),对比两种吻合方式吻合口瘘发生率及术后三年复发转移情况。结果两组吻合口瘘发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后三年无复发转移情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经上腹、右胸行食管癌切除、食管-胃胸顶器械吻合在保证患者术后生存时间的基础上,减少了吻合口瘘的发生,优于传统的食管胃颈部吻合的手术方式。Objective To investigate the application value of gastro-esophageal instrumental anastomosis at the chest top in re- section of carcinoma at the upper/middle part of esophagus. Methods We performed the operations of esophageal carcinoma in 247 cases. Of these patients, 108 were treated with the method of gastro-esophageal anastomosis at the chest top ( thoracic gastro-esophageal anastomosis group)while another 139 were treated with the traditional method of gastro-esophageal anastomosis in neck (neck gastro-e- sophageal anastomosis group). The incidence of anastomotic fistula and postoperative 3 year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results There was significant difference in the incidence of anastomosis fistula between the two groups ( P 〈 O. 05 ). By contrast, no significant difference in the postoperative 3 year survival rate was found between the two groups. Conclusion The method of gastro-esophageal instrumental anastomosis at the chest top has a lower incidence of anastomotic fistula that is better than the tradi- tional method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183