检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2014年第23期3645-3648,共4页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的旨在了解老年维持性血液透析患者情绪调节的自我效能(RESE)水平。方法使用的调查表分两大部分,一部分是白编患者一般资料问卷表,另一部分是情绪调节自我效能量表和社会支持评定量表。对100例维持性血液透析的老年患者进行问卷调查。在自愿的原则下,问卷调查表由患者自己填写,如文化水平较低或填写不便时,由调查者逐一向患者读,再由患者自己选项。结果维持性血液透析患者情绪调节自我效能得分平均为(31.47±6.39)分,社会支持得分平均为(31.26±5.82)分,经多元线性回归分析显示:文化程度、是否独居、家庭经济状况、社会支持水平是情绪调节自我效能的影响因素,其t=2.637、-2.851、3.172、3.052,而且社会支持低于常模。结论由于受多种个体因素差异的影响,大部分老年维持性血液透析患者的RESE处于中、低等水平,护理人员应采取相应的措施协助、指导提高患者情绪调节自我效能。Objective To study the level and influencing factors of regulatory emotional selfeffieacy (RESE) in elderly patients undergoing maintenanee hemodialysis (MHD). Methods 100 elderly patients undergoing MHD were investigated voluntarily by a self-designed demographic questionnaire, Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale (RESES) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). If it was difficult for patients to finish the questionnaire, nurses would give assistance. Results The average score of RESES was (31.47± 6.39), and the average score of SSRS was (31.26 ± 5.82). Multiple stepwise regression showed influencing factors of RESE were educational level, solitary or not, family economic conditions and social support level (t = 2.637, - 2.851, 3.172, 3.052), with social support level lower than norm. Conclusions Most elderly patients undergoing MHD show middle or low level of RESE, which is influenced by individual factors. Nurse should take proper measures to improve their RESE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.33.133