检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学商学院,上海200241 [2]无锡城市职业技术学院旅游系,江苏无锡214153
出 处:《世界地理研究》2014年第4期107-116,共10页World Regional Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13BGL094);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(2012SJD630105);无锡城市职业技术学院院级课题(WXCY-2012-RY-003)
摘 要:以苏南地区5城市为研究对象,建立由基础环境、居民消费、休闲相关产业和特色资源构成的城市休闲化水平评价指标体系,并构建综合测度模型,对南京、苏州、无锡、常州和镇江5座城市休闲化差异进行实证分析。结果表明:(1)苏南地区城市休闲化水平存在显著差异,其中苏州、南京处于领先地位,无锡处于中间水平,镇江与常州则相对滞后;(2)苏南地区城市部休闲化差异较大,休闲相关产业指数较大,特色资源指数较小;(3)苏南地区城市间休闲化差异主要体现在16个二级指标中,其中休闲相关产业指标8个,特色资源指标4个,基础环境指标3个,居民消费指标1个。Taking five cities in south Jiangsu as research object, this paperconstructs an evaluation index system of city recreationalization, includingfour aspects: basic environment, residential consumption, leisure-related industry,characteristic resources. Through establishing evaluation model, thispaper takes five cities in south Jiangsu as cases to evaluate the recreationalizationdifferences. The results suggest: (1) south Jiangsu cities recreationalizationlevel presents a clear disparity, which of Suzhou and Nanjingis strong, followed by Wuxi and that of Zhenjiang and Changzhou is weak. (2)There is a significant difference of inner cities in south Jiangsu cities, theindex of leisure-related industry is bigger, and that of characteristic resourcesis smaller. (3) The differences of recreationalization between southJiangsu cities is mainly reflected in sixteen secondary indicators, includingeight indicators of leisure-related industry, four indicators of characteristicresources, three indicators of base environment, and one indicator of residentialconsumption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15