检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2014年第12期1144-1146,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:北京市顺义区科委项目(2011-003)
摘 要:目的比较针刺配合艾灸与针刺配合神灯治疗类风湿关节炎的临床疗效。方法将150例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组75例,治疗组采用针刺配合艾灸治疗,对照组采用针刺配合神灯治疗,均治疗2个疗程。比较两组治疗前后VAS评分及临床体征分级与评分。结果两组治疗后VAS评分和临床体征评分均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率为93.3%,对照组为78.7%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组明显优于对照组。结论针刺配合艾灸较针刺配合神灯治疗类风湿关节炎疗效明显。Objective To compare the clinical efficacies of acupuncture plus TDP lamp versus acupuncture plus moxibustion in treating rheumatoid arthritis. Method One hundred and fifty patients were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups, 75 cases each. The treatment group received acupuncture plus moxibustion and the control group, acupuncture plus TDP radiation. Both groups were treated for two courses. The VAS scores and the clinical sign grades and scores were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Result The VAS score and the clinical sign score improved in both groups after treatment compared with before (P〈0.05). The total efficacy rate was 93.3% in the treatment group and 78.7% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). The effect was better in the treatment group than in the control group. Conclusion Acupuncture plus moxibustion is more effective than acupuncture plus TDP lamp in treating rheumatoid arthritis.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38