民事诉讼法证据制度对海关行政处罚证据制度的借鉴  

Research on the Reference of the Rules of Civil Action Evidence from the Evidence System of Administrative Sanction of Customs

作　　者：杨宁[1] 吴惺惺[2] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海200433 [2]巢湖学院,安徽合肥238000

出　　处：《行政与法》2014年第11期82-86,共5页Administration and Law

基　　金：复旦大学"985工程"三期整体推进社会科学研究项目的阶段性成果;项目批准号:2011SHKXZD014

摘　　要：民事诉讼与行政处罚在认识过程与结构上有许多相似之处,这也决定了二者在具体制度设计上的相互借鉴。海关行政处罚的现有证据制度在很大程度上也是借鉴了原来民事诉讼法中证据的相关规定。2012年修订的民事诉讼法对于证据制度作了很多修改,尤其是强化了当事人举证的责任,使得民事诉讼向当事人主义更进一步。本文结合民事诉讼法修订的内容以及民事诉讼中原有相关证据规则,对海关行政处罚现有证据制度不足与潜在风险进行了分析,提出应借鉴民事诉讼证据制度修订的内容修改原海关行政处罚证据制度。There are many similarities in the cognitive process and structure of civil litigation and administrative sanction,which decides that the two learn from each other in specific system design;and the current evidence system of administrative sanction of customs have drawn on the experience of the relevant provisions about evidence in the old civil procedure law to a great extent.In 2012,civil procedure law had been revised,in which the rules of evidence had been changed a lot,especially strengthening the burden of proof of the parties,which made civil actions closer to doctrine of punishment on party.The rules of civil action evidence had been revised,so the evidence system of administrative sanction of customs should be accordingly revised in the same way.This article,combining with the amendment of civil procedure law and the relevant evidence rules in the old civil procedure law,analyzes the deficiency and the potential risk of the current evidence system of administration sanction of customs,and puts forward the suggestion：we should revise the old evidence system of administrative sanction of customs from drawing on the experience of the amendment of civil procedure law.

关 键 词：民事诉讼法 行政处罚 证据 

分 类 号：D922.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]