检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院肿瘤内科二科,江苏江阴214400
出 处:《西部中医药》2014年第11期134-136,共3页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理对乳腺癌化疗患者自尊水平和应对方式的影响。方法:将乳腺癌术后化疗患者58例随机均分为观察组和对照组,对照组采用常规护理,观察组给予循证护理。观察护理前后2组患者的自尊水平(自卑感量表,FIS)评分和应对方式(医学应对问卷量表,MCMQ)评分变化情况。结果:护理前2组患者FIS和MCMQ各项评分均无明显差异(P>0.05);护理后2组患者FIS各项评分均明显增加,观察组评分较对照组增加显著(P<0.05);观察组MCMQ评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),而回避、屈服评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:循证护理能显著提高乳腺癌化疗患者的自尊水平,改善应对方式。Objective: To explore the effects of evidence-based nursing on self-respect degree and coping mode of mammary cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: Fifty-eight patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. The patients in the control group were given with routine care and the observation group with evidence-based nursing. The scores of self-respect degree(the feelings of inadequacy scale,FIS) and coping modes(medical coping modes questionnaire, MCMQ) in both groups were observed before and after the nursing. Results: There was no obvious difference in FIS and MCMQ scales between both groups before nursing(P 〉0.05); FIS scores of both groups were increased remarkably after nursing, the increase of the observation group was more evident than that of the control group(P〈0.05); the observation group was higher than the control group remarkably in MCMQ scales(P〈0.05), lower than the control group in avoidance and yield scores(P〈0.05).Conclusion: Evidence-based nursing could raise self-respect degree and improve coping styles of mammary cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy apparently.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28