检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第6期67-71,共5页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:德国不当得利法是清季变法和民国民法典不当得利法的理论基础,并在后民法通则时期于学术界受到重视,苏联不当得利法对我国不当得利法及其解释也具有潜移默化的影响。我国司法实践对不当得利法的态度则较为冷淡,与学理有着明显的疏离。我国不当得利法的解释,应当在对其渊源流变保持清醒认识和适当尊重的基础上进行审慎思考,在与现行立法框架和司法实践保持良性互动的基础上,构建自身的解释体系。Unjust enrichment in German law,which received attention in academia again in the later period of general principals of the civil law,is the theoretical basis of Qing dynasty law reform and the unjust enrichment law in the civil code of the Republic of China.Unjust enrichment law in Soviet Union law also has a subtle influence on the unjust enrichment law and its interpretations in China.The attitude of the judicial practice in our country for unjust enrichment is more lukewarm,and there is an obvious alienation between theory and practice.The interpretations of unjust enrichment in our country should be thought carefully and clearly on the basis of a conscious version and appropriate respect to origin and evolution of unjust enrichment,and build its own interpretation theory system on the basis of a good interaction between current legislative framework and judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.175.182