检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董加伟[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100 [2]中国海监山东省总队,山东济南250002
出 处:《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第4期84-88,92,共5页Journal of Hohai University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:山东大学自主创新基金项目(IFYT1401)
摘 要:按照权利绝对论的权利概念,权利之间永远不会发生冲突,但在真实世界中权利冲突是客观存在的,自海域使用权诞生以来,其与传统渔民用权之间的冲突就愈演愈烈,实践中相关案例不断出现,理论上相关论争也从未间断。权利领域存在交叉塑造了二者之间冲突的基因,但更深层次的原因在于权属安排的粗疏、冲突规范的不当和行政行为的功利。应加强理论研究,改进顶层设计,推动立法完善,合理界定海域使用权与传统渔民用海权的权利内容,明确界分二者的权利边界,修订完善权利冲突规范,通过法学理论层面溯源清本进而完善制度设计予以根本解决。According to absolute theory of rights, it is impossible to have conflicts between rights. However,in the real world the rights conflict is an objective existence.The conflict between the use rights of sea area and the maritime rights of traditional fishermen has been intensifying since the existence of the former with related cases appearing constantly in practice and related debate going on in theoretical circles. The paper maintains that the overlapping existence leads to the conflict between them and shows that the deep reasons lie in rough ownership arrangement, slack conflict rules and improper administrative act. It then proposes that theoretical research should be strengthened and top design should be improved It is important to promote legislation and reasonably define the contents of the use rights of sea area and the maritime rights of traditional fishermen. Also,it is compulsory to clearly define the rights boundary of the two rights. To fundamentally cope with the problem,it is imperative to improve the norms of rights conflict and the system design on the basis of the law theory.
分 类 号:D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15