检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王启盛[1] 吕亚莉[1] 陈传军[1] 刘笑笑[1] 杨彬[1]
出 处:《中国药师》2014年第12期2082-2084,共3页China Pharmacist
基 金:浙江省医学会临床科研基金项目(编号:2012ZYC-B3)
摘 要:目的:比较盐酸羟考酮缓释片和盐酸曲马多缓释片治疗中度癌痛的疗效和安全性。方法:中度癌痛患者290例随机分为观察组148例与对照组142例。观察组口服盐酸羟考酮缓释片,对照组口服盐酸曲马多缓释片治疗,疗程2周。比较两组患者镇痛总有效率和不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组与对照组镇痛总有效率分别为92.6%和81.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);药品不良反应发生率分别为60.1%和57.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:盐酸羟考酮缓释片治疗中度癌痛患者优于盐酸曲马多缓释片。Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oxycodone hydrochloride prolonged-release tablets and tramadol hydrochloride sustained-release tablets in the treatment of moderate cancer pain. Methods: Totally 290 cases of the patients with moderate pain were divided into the observation group with 148 cases and the control group with 142 cases. The observation group received oxycodone hydrochloride prolonged-release tablets,while the control group was given tramadol hydrochloride sustained-release tablets.The treatment course was 2 weeks,and the total efficiency and the incidence of adverse drug reactions( ADR) in the two groups were calculated and compared. Results: The total efficiency in the observation group and the control group was 92. 6% and 81. 7%,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 01). The incidence of ADR was 60. 1% and 57%,respectively with no significant difference( P〉0. 05). Conclusion: The effect of oxycodone hydrochloride prolonged-release tablets in the treatment of moderate cancer pain is better than that of tramadol hydrochloride sustained-release tablets.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38