检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海200092
出 处:《防灾减灾工程学报》2014年第5期656-662,共7页Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(91315301);科技部国家重点实验室基础研究项目(SLDRCE08-B-03)资助
摘 要:为对比分析5·12汶川地震和3·11东日本大地震的加速度反应谱和结构地震反应特征,挑选132条汶川地震和404条东日本大地震中Ⅱ类场地上的水平向加速度记录,进行统计分析。根据这两次大地震的标准加速度反应谱,给出了拟合谱曲线。将所得拟合谱作为需求谱,分别对6层框架结构和20层框架结构进行了Pushover分析,比较在上述两次大地震下不同框架结构地震反应的差异。结果表明:东日本大地震记录比汶川地震记录具有较明显的长周期地震动特征;两次地震记录的区别在高层框架结构的地震反应上表现得更加明显,东日本大地震记录对具有较长自振周期的结构的地震反应影响更为显著。To make the comparative analysis of the acceleration spectrums of 5. 12 Wenchuan Earthquake and 3. 11 Great East Japan Earthquake and make the seismic response analysis of structures,132 horizontal acceleration records of Wenchuan Earthquake and 404 horizontal acceleration records of the Great East Japan Earthquake were selected. The site type is Ⅱ. The standard acceleration response spectrums and the fitting response spectrums of the two earthquakes were got by statistical analysis. Then the fitting response spectrums were used as the demand spectrums to do the Pushover analysis on a 6-story frame structure and a 20-story frame structure. The seismic response differences between the two structures under the two selected earthquakes were analyzed. The results show that compared to the Wenchuan Earthquake,the Great East Japan Earthquake presents long-period characteristics. Also,more obvious differences between the two earthquakes are shown on high-rise frame structures. The Great East Japan Earthquake has greater effects on long-period structures.
关 键 词:汶川地震 东日本大地震 反应谱比较 不同高度框架结构 PUSHOVER分析
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229