检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]化学工程联合国家重点实验室,天津大学化工学院,天津300072
出 处:《化学工业与工程》2014年第6期24-28,34,共6页Chemical Industry and Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(20736005)
摘 要:采用数字全息干涉法测量了25℃乙二醇-水物系的扩散系数。详细介绍了实验方法以及2种处理干涉图像获得扩散系数的方法,即横条纹法和弯条纹法。通过测量25℃时0.33 mol/L KCl溶液的扩散验证了实验的精确性。分别用2种方法获得了6个不同质量分数下的乙二醇-水物系的扩散系数,并与文献值进行了对比。结果表明,弯曲条纹法的平均相对偏差是1.3%,比水平条纹法的1.7%小,同时,弯曲条纹法的平均标准偏差更小,说明波动更小。Real-Time digital holography is used to measure the diffusivities of ethylene glycol-water system at 25 ℃. The experimental technique and two methods based on horizontal and curved fringes for processing holographic image data are presented in detail. 0. 33 mol·L^-1 aqueous solution of potassium chloride at 25 ℃ was used as a reference system to check the two methods. Compared with literature data,the results show that both methods are reliable with good accuracy. Measurements are conducted at 6 concentrations of the ethylene glycol-water system and the results of both methods are also compared with the reported data. The average relative deviation of the curved fringe method is 1. 3%,slightly superior to that of the horizontal fringes method. Moreover,diffusivities calculated by the two methods fluctuate with the choice of time. A comparison of the standard deviations of the two methods shows that the curved fringe method is more stable than the horizontal fringe method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15