《四库分类法》与《中国图书馆分类法》比较研究  

Comparative Study on “Complete Library in Four Branches of Literature Classification” and “Chinese Library Classification”

作　　者：邓维维[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁省图书馆,辽宁沈阳110015

出　　处：《情报探索》2014年第11期127-131,共5页Information Research

摘　　要：根据图书分类工作实践,从历史沿革、列类原则、标记符号、类目设置等方面对《四库分类法》与《中国图书馆分类法》(第五版)进行了比较研究,总结了两部分类法之间的相同与差异。对《四库分类法》提出跳出《四库全书》,在现有古籍的基础上设置类目,添加详细易懂的类目注释,提出电子版、网络版分类法等建议;对《中国图书馆分类法》类分古籍的类目设置提出类目加细,影响较大的专著设置专类,并针对中华文化文史哲不分家的特点多设置交替类目等建议。According to books classification practice, the paper makes a comparative study on ＂Complete Library in Four Branches of Literature Classification＂ and the fifth edition of ＂Chinese Library Classification＂ from aspects of history, listed categories principles, marks, and category setting, summarizes the similarities and differences of the two classifications. It suggests for ＂Complete Library in Four Branches of Literature Classification＂ to set category on the basis of the existing ancient books except Sikuquanshu, add detail and understandable category annotations, and add electronic version and Internet version of it. And it suggests for ＂Chinese Library Classification＂ to refine the category, set up a special category for monograph having greater influence, and set up alternative category according to the co-occurrence characteristic of literature, history and philosophy of the Chinese culture on classifying ancient books.

关 键 词：四库分类法 中国图书馆分类法 对比研究 

分 类 号：G254.1[文化科学—图书馆学]