检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张理义[1] 孔令明[1] 张其军 陶凤燕 马爱国[4] 刘云[5] 高玉芳 涂德华[7] 白香辉 苏为吉 王丽杰[10] 路芳 宋文党 张信忠 孟新珍[14] 王一牛 谢洪波 周小东
机构地区:[1]解放军第102医院全军心理疾病防治中心,江苏常州213003 [2]宁波市江北区92919部队医院,浙江宁波315000 [3]南通市崇川区体臣卫校,江苏南通226000 [4]南京市海军指挥学院卫勤系,江苏南京210000 [5]阜阳市第三人民医院,安徽阜阳236000 [6]常州市妇幼保健院,江苏常州213000 [7]马鞍山市中心医院,安徽马鞍山243000 [8]内蒙古国际蒙医医院,内蒙古呼和浩特010000 [9]宁波市92899部队,浙江宁波315000 [10]烟台市解放军第107医院,山东烟台264000 [11]淄博市张店区干休所卫生队,山东淄博255000 [12]眉山市东坡区象耳镇77159部队,四川眉山620000 [13]重庆市沙坪坝区95661部队后勤部,中国重庆226000 [14]解放军第23医院,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 [15]北京市西城区老干部思想政治工作研究会,中国北京100000 [16]吉林市船营区65328部队卫生队,吉林吉林132000 [17]石家庄市解放军第256医院,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2014年第6期36-40,共5页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
基 金:总后勤部卫生部军队心理卫生应用性科研课题(编号12XLZ216)
摘 要:目的 编制中国社会支持量表,并对其进行信、效度检验.方法 通过文献回顾、预测验等构建初问卷,并采用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、相关分析等方法检验其信效度.结果 探索性因素分析抽取主观支持、客观支持和社会支持利用度3个因子,累计方差贡献率为55.918%,另有1个掩饰分量表(含4个条目).验证性因素分析模型拟合优度指数显示:CMIn=310.256,DF=128,P<0.01,CMIN/DF=2.424,AGFI=0.917,GFI=0.902,TLI=0.952,IFI=0.897,CFI=0.876,RMSEA=0.056.总量表Cronbach'sα系数为0.821,各因子为0.631-0.685(P<0.01);总量表分半系数为0.875,各因子为0.547-0.709(P<0.01);总量表重测相关系数为0.829,各因子为0.645-0.756(P<0.01).中国社会支持量表各个因子之间及各因子与总量表存在显著相关,相关系数为0.486-0.796(P<0.01).中国社会支持量表总分与社会支持评定量表总分存在显著负相关(P<0.01),与中国心身健康量表总分呈显著正相关(P<0.05或0.01).结论 中国社会支持量表的信度、效度符合心理测量学要求,可作为中国人社会支持水平的评估工具.Objective To develop Chinese People's Social Support Scale (CPSSS) and verify its reliability and validity. Methods Initial questionnaire was developed via literature review and pre-test, its reliability and validity were verified with exploratory factor, confirmatory factor and correlation analysis and so on. Results Such 3 factors were taken from exploratory factor analysis as subjective support, objective support and social support availability, accumulative variance contribution rate was 55.91%, and it had L subscale (4 items). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that CMIn= 310. 256 ,DF= 128, P〈0.01, CMIN/DF =2. 424,AGFI=0. 917,GFI=0. 902,TLI=0. 952, IFI=0. 897, CFI=0. 876,RMSEA=0. 056. The Cronbach's a coefficient of total scale was 0. 821 and factors were 0. 631-0. 685 (P〈0.01) ; The split-half correlation coefficient of total scale was 0. 875 and factors were 0. 547-0. 709(P〈0.01) ; The test-retest correlation coefficient of total scale was 0. 829 and factors were 0. 645-0. 756(P〈0.01). There were significant correlation between factor and factor as well as factor and total scale of the CPSSS. The total score of the CPSSS was negatively related to that of the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) significantly (P〈 0.01) and positively to that the Chinese Psychosomatic Health Scale (CPSHS) (P〈0.05 or 0.01). Conclusion The CPSSS' reliability and validity are up to psychometric requirement and it could be used as an evaluation tool for Chinese social support level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229