共识与分歧:转型期我国失地农民利益表达研究综述  

Agreement and Difference:A Review of Researches into the Interest Expression of Land-lost Peasants in Transformation Period

作　　者：汪小红[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽农业大学人文社科学院,安徽合肥230036 [2]南京大学社会学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2014年第11期70-75,共6页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"现阶段我国社会矛盾演变趋势;特征及对策研究"(项目号12AZD041);安徽省优秀青年人才基金重点项目"转型期失地农民利益表达机制研究"(项目号2013SQRW017ZD)

摘　　要：学术界对当前我国越来越严重的失地农民利益表达问题予以了高度关注,并形成了丰硕的研究成果。通过对成果的梳理发现,研究者的观点共识和分歧并存。共识主要体现在失地农民利益受损原因、利益表达方式、非制度化利益表达倾向及其行动选择机制层面上,分歧则主要体现于研究视角差异化下如何重构有效和有序的失地农民利益表达机制问题上。建议未来研究在微观层面应关注失地农民行动策略选择的动力机制,在宏观层面应关注整体性政策组合的建构,以推动对失地农民由非制度化到制度化利益表达的转向。People have paid adequate attention to the increasingly serious problems as the interest expression by the land-lost peasants in academic circle and they have made great fruits.Through the sorting of such fruits,we can find there exist both parallels and divergence.The former show in the causes of interest damage,interest expressions,non-institutionalized in-clination of interest expression and the choice of their action.And the latter mainly lies in how to reconstruct the effective and well-ordered interest-expression mechanism while there exists difference in perspectives of their study.The author of this paper suggests that we pay attention to the motivation mechanism of action-chosen strategies by land-lost peasants at a micro level. And at a macro one,we focus on the construction of relevant policies in order to contribute to the transformation from the non-institutionalized interest expression to the institutionalized one by land-lost peasants.

关 键 词：失地农民 利益表达 非制度化 机制重构 

分 类 号：C912[经济管理]