检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400030 [2]中信银行总行营业部,北京100033
出 处:《中国管理科学》2014年第11期131-139,共9页Chinese Journal of Management Science
摘 要:使用前沿异质性双边随机边界模型测度我国上市公司过度投资程度,运用结构方程路径分析双重委托代理问题对投资过度的作用机制和具体效应。得出:(1)我国上市公司过度投资与投资不足并存,其中,代理成本引致的过度投资使投资支出超出其最优水平的31.4%,占样本的42.8%;(2)管理层持股通过自由现金流、债务、股利支付等不同路径影响公司投资,能有效缓解过度投资,而大股东代理通过自由现金流和债务结构加剧投资过度;(3)双重委托代理对公司投资影响的77.38%是通过自由现金流路径实现的,债务路径的贡献率占21.24%,股利路径表现不显著,未能产生显著的约束功效。Two-frontier heterogeneity stochastic frontier model is used to measure the over-investment level of listed companies of China, and Structural equation as well as path analysis are exert to research the mechanism and effects that dual principal-agent problem affects the over-investment of companies. The conclusions are as follows. (1)In China, over-investment and under-investment are both existed in the lis- ted companies. Over-investment which is caused by agency cost makes investment cost have a 31.4% plus over the best level, and occupies 42.8% of the sample. (2)Managerial stockholding incentive wouM ease the over-investment of listed companies through the paths of free cash flow, capital structure and dividend payment. On the contrary, the control of large shareholders would aggravate over-investment through the paths of free cash flow and capital structure. (3) 77.38% of company investment effect caused by dual principal-agent problem is brought about through the path of free cash flow. The rest 21.24% is contribu- ted by the path of debt. The path of dividend is not remarkable, and does not produce remarkable con- straint efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3