检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]集美大学工商管理学院 [2]厦门大学财务与会计研究院
出 处:《中大管理研究》2014年第3期1-24,共24页China Management Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AJY005);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(12JJD790030);福建省社科规划项目(2012B140);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JA13176S);集美大学科研基金(Q201312)资助
摘 要:新制度经济学认为制度变迁是为了提高效率。作为一种强制性制度变迁,检验会计准则国际趋同是否促进资本市场效率提升具有重要意义。股价同步性反映了资本市场定价效率。考虑到会计准则国际趋同与股权分置改革时间重叠带来的制度噪音,本文试图控制制度变革因素,检验财务私有信息与股价同步性的关联关系的变化。研究发现随着我国市场化改革的不断深入,利用财务私有信息套利的空间逐渐被压缩,但资本市场仍未能对财务私有信息有效定价。股权分置改革能促进股价同步性的降低,但会计准则国际趋同才是压缩财务私有信息套利空间的主导制度变革因素。Neo-institutional economics argues that institutional evolution is aimed to improve efficiency. Since accounting standards convergence is a mode of compulsory institutional evolution, it is significant to explore whether accounting standards convergence improves capital market efficiency. Synchronicity reflects the capital market pricing efficiency. Considering the institutional noise brought by the time overlapping of accounting standards convergence and equit3' division reform, this paper, tries to test the changes of the relationship between synchronicity and financial private information, controlling institutional reform factor as well. It is tbund that the space of arbitrage using financial private information has been squeezed with the deepening of the market-oriented reforms in China. However, the capital market still can't price efficiently for financial private information. Although equity division reform has lowered the synchronicity, accounting standards convergence is the nstitutional reform factor causing the squeezed space of financial private information arbitrage
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185