以居港权案件为基础探讨《基本法》解释机制  

Investigation of the Basic Law Interpretation Mechanism Based on the Cases of Right of Abode in Hong Kong

作　　者：李培东[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期48-53,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition

摘　　要：鉴于解释体制的不同,《基本法》第158条确立了对其的双轨解释机制。作为中国香港特别行政区法院提请全国人民代表大会常务委员会解释《基本法》的典型案例,一系列居港权案展现了两种不同解释体制之间的冲突和磨合,暴露出提请人大释法制度缺乏约束机制。通过理清中国香港特别行政区法院和全国人民代表大会常务委员会的解释权权限划分及建立对终审法院提请释法的约束机制,探讨了完善《基本法》解释机制。In view of the difference of the interpretation system , the Article 158 of the Basic Law established a mech-anism of the two-track interpretation of the Basic Law.As typical cases of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal re-ferred to the NPCSC, a series of cases of the right of abode in Hong Kong have shown the conflict between two differ -ent interpretation systems , and exposed the lack of restraint to the reference to NPCSC .The paper tries to perfect in-terpretation mechanism of the Basic Law by clarifying the division of jurisdiction between the courts of Hong Kong and the NPCSC and by establishing the restraint mechanisms to the reference to NPCSC to interpret the Basic Law.

关 键 词：居港权案 《基本法》 《基本法》解释权 人大释法 约束机制 

分 类 号：D921.9[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]