检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安志红[1] 王殿华[1] 朱健 吴晓棣 张静[1] 许家俊[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市第二人民医院ICU,上海200011 [2]上海市第九人民医院急诊科
出 处:《中国临床保健杂志》2014年第6期570-573,I0007,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare
基 金:上海市卫生局资助项目(20114332)
摘 要:目的:探讨危重症患者中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)与营养风险筛查-2002(NRS-2002)的关系。方法选择重症监护病房(ICU)的128例危重症患者,按下列分组:组 A (APACHEⅡ<18分)34例、组 B(18分≤APACHEⅡ≤25分)63例、组 C(APACHEⅡ>25分)31例;Ⅰ组(NRS-2002分值在0~4分)28例、Ⅱ组(NRS-2002分值在5~6分)68例、Ⅲ组(NRS-2002分值7分)32例,分别比较下列指标:住院天数、住院总费用、日均住院费用、并发症数、并发症发生率、病死率在各组间的差异,并分析 APACHEⅡ与 NRS-2002的相关性。结果在 A /B/C 分组中,随着 APACHEⅡ分值的增加,日均住院费用、并发症数、病死率、NRS-2002分值等指标升高明显(P <0.05);在Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ分组中,随 NRS-2002分值增加,APACHEⅡ分值、日均住院费用、住院总费用、并发症数、并发症发生率等指标增加显著(P <0.05)。APACHEⅡ分值与 NRS-2002分值呈正相关(r =0.509,P =0.000)。结论APACHEⅡ与 NRS-2002均有助于判断危重症患者的病情及预后,两者相结合,可以更好指导临床医师对患者进行病情评估及预后判断。Objective To explore the relationship between acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱand nutrition risk screening -2002 among severe patients.Method A total of 1 28 severe patients were chosen in in-tensive care unit(ICU)of our hospital from May 201 1 to October 201 2.The patients were divided into six groups:group A(n =34,APACHEⅡ score 〈1 8),group B(n =63,APACHEⅡ score ranged from 1 8 to 25),group C(n =31 ,APACHEⅡ score 〉25),groupⅠ(n =28,NRS-2002 score ranged from 0 to 4),groupⅡ(n =68,NRS-2002 score ranged from 5 to 6),group Ⅲ(n =32,NRS-2002 score is 7).The duration of hospitalization,total expenses,daily ex- penses,incidence rate of complications,mortality rate were compared among these groups.Then,the interrelationship between APACHE Ⅱ and NRS-2002 was also analyzed.Results Among the A,B and C groups,the duration of hos-pitalization,total expenses,daily expenses,incidence rate of complications,mortality rate,and NRS-2002 score were increased (P 〈0.05)with the increase of APACHEⅡ score.the duration of hospitalization,total expenses,daily ex-penses,incidence rate of complications,mortality rate,and APACHE Ⅱ score were also increased (P 〈0.05)with the increase of NRS-2002 score among theⅠ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups.The APACHEⅡand NRS-2002 were positively corre-lated (r =0.509,P =0.000).Conclusion The APACHEⅡ and NRS-2002 are helpful to estimate the severity and prognosis of severe patients.Even more,the combination of these two scores system may be more meaningful.
关 键 词:急性病生理学和长期健康评价 营养调查 危重 病人医疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3