后现代主义史学在台湾的反响  

Repercussions of Postmodernist Historiography in Taiwan District

作　　者：李勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学研究生处,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《温州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期3-10,共8页Journal of Wenzhou University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(07JJD770119)

摘　　要：20世纪末21世纪初,不少西方后现代主义历史著作已在台湾地区翻译出版,引起一些史学家高度关注。杜维运系统批判后现代主义,晚年流露出强烈的担忧乃至憎恶。汪荣祖、古伟瀛、黄进兴、孙隆基等,也论述过后现代主义史学。后现代主义影响了台湾地区史学实践,20世纪末台湾地区学者历史著作就有后现代主义倾向,到了21世纪,更多的具有后现代主义色彩的著作面世了,其一些历史认识确系新见。无论学界怎样评价,后现代主义治学精神、根本理念与传统学术并无二致,乘势而用,将会对台湾地区史学界发挥积极作用。From the end of the 20th century till the beginning of the 21st century, many works ofpostmodernist historical writing has been translated and published in Taiwan, which aroused historiographers’close attention. Du Weiyun gives a serie of refutations to Postmodernism, and expresses worries and evendetestations to postmodernism in his later years. Wang Rongzu, Gu Weiying, Huang Jinxing and Sun Longji,argued about postmodernism hitorigraphy respaectively. Postmodernism influences the historical practice inTaiwan district, so as to characterize the postmodernist tendency for historical works written by Taiwanscholars. More and more works with heavy postmodernist coloue come out until the 21st century, some ofwhich proved to bear brandnew insights. No matter how the educational circles evaluate the postmodernism,the spirits of research, fundamental ideas and traditional acadimics are just unchanged. Best advantage of thepostmodernism will play a positive role in the historian circles of Taiwan district.

关 键 词：后现代主义 史学 台湾地区 

分 类 号：K0[历史地理—历史学]