检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:职建军[1] 何景阳[2] 李蓬[2] 张栓虎[1] 于杰[1] 曹玉红 王利娜[4] 张延炀[2]
机构地区:[1]安阳市疾病预防控制中心,河南安阳455000 [2]河南省疾病预防控制中心 [3]嵩县疾病预防控制中心 [4]尉氏县疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《河南预防医学杂志》2014年第4期280-282,288,共4页Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的了解安阳市医疗机构中乙型肝炎诊断报告现状,为进一步提高诊断报告质量提供依据。方法采用分层随机抽样的方法分别抽取市区、县不同类型医疗机构,随机抽取其2012年报告病例作为调查对象,按中国疾病预防控制中心2012年乙型肝炎监测项目技术方案进行核实;对医务人员掌握乙肝诊断报告相关知识情况进行问卷调查。结果诊断准确率为60.04%,报告准确率为43.71%,误诊率为39.96%,误报率为56.29%。一级医院、二级医院、三级医院和专科医院的诊断和报告差异有统计学意义(x2=40.851,P<0.05;x2=70.742,P<0.05),但是一级医院和二级医院差异无统计学意义(x2=0.021,P>0.05;x2=0.024,P>0.05)。结论调查医疗机构的乙肝病例诊断报告准确率不高,今后要加强专业培训、技术指导和行政监督。Objective To study the current situation of hepatitis B diagnostic reports among the medical institutions in Anyang City,and to provide the evidence for improving the diagnostic report quality. Methods Reported cases in2012,which were randomly selected from medical institutions at different type in urban and county,were verified according to the Hepatitis monitoring project technical solutions in 2012 by Chinese Center for Disease Control;A questionnaires with knowledge about the diagnostic reports of hepatitis B was conducted among medical personnel.Results Diagnostic accuracy was 60.04 %,report accuracy was 43.71%,misdiagnosis rate was 39.96 %,false alarm rate was 56.29 %. There are differences(x^2=40.851,P〈0.05;x^2=70.742,P〈0.05)level diagnostic report hospitals,secondary hospitals,tertiary hospitals and specialist hospitals,However,no differences in the primary and secondary hospitals Hospital(x^2=0.021,P〉0.05;x^2=0.024,P〉0.05). Conclusions The accuracy of the hepatitis B cases diagnostic reports of medical institutions was not good. It is necessary to strengthen the professional training,technical guidance and administrative oversight.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222