宪法自由权与平等权冲突的解决途径  

Approaches for Conflicts Solution between Constitutional Liberty Rights and Equality Rights

作　　者：陈征[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2014年第12期80-86,157,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：在不同的基本权利主体之间,自由权与平等权经常会产生冲突。在必要的情况下,立法机关和司法机关必须积极介入并对二者之间的冲突进行平衡,这是我国宪法第51条的要求。立法机关需要制定法律规范来平衡双方相互冲突的法益,而司法机关则需要在个案中衡量平等权受到损害的强度以及自由权所蕴含的宪法价值。衡量相互冲突的利益需要运用一些特定的标准和方法。在无法达成实践中调和的情况下,只得优先考虑一方的基本权利。Conflicts often occur between liberty rights and equality rights among different subjects of fundamental rights. According to Constitution of PRC,Article 51,legislatures and judiciaries have to actively intervene and balance the conflicts as occasion requires. Legislatures should balance benefits of both the conflicting parties by making a law. Meanwhile,judiciaries are expected to ascertain not only the degree of how equality rights have been invaded,but also the constitutional value of liberty rights. Specific standards and methods are needed when measuring benefits of the conflicting parties. If conflicts cannot be mediated in practice,there's no choice but to take the fundamental rights of one party as a priority.

关 键 词：自由权 平等权 基本权利冲突 立法平衡 司法平衡 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]