检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈庆[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心 [2]南京师范大学泰州学院
出 处:《知识产权》2014年第12期44-49,共6页Intellectual Property
基 金:2014年国家知识产权局软科学项目(编号:SS14-A-19)基金资助
摘 要:通过利用现代制药技术萃取植物药中的有效物质成分申请专利已经为各国专利法所普遍接受,但该角度的专利保护无法为基于传统知识披露的传统植物药提供全面合理的保护。对于传统植物药以传统知识形式披露的药物价值用途可以成为医药用途专利,对其实用性的考察应从"产业可利用性"到"有用性"的演化过程入手,以期符合传统植物药医药用途专利的实用性要求。In spite of the fact that it is widely accepted in the patent law over the world that extracing the effective composition of plant medicine by using the modern pharmaceutical technology is patentability, patent law cannot provide comprehensive reasonable protection for traditional plant medicine which is based on traditional knowledge disclosure. The medical value application of traditional plant medicine based on traditional knowledge disclosure can be applied for medical use patents. In order to meet the practicability requirements of medical use patent of traditional plant medicine, it is suggested that the examination of practicability should follow the evolutionary process from "Industrial Applicability" to "Usefulness".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.199