FUS－2000尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜检测尿液红细胞的对比分析  

Contrast Analysis of Erythrocyte Detection in Urine by FUS-2000 Automatic Urine Sediment Analyzer and Microscope

作　　者：王伟娟[1] 杨焦峰[2] 康丽霞[1] 郑辉[1] 孔玉凤[1] 

机构地区：[1]新乡医学院第三附属医院检验科,河南新乡453003 [2]新乡医学院第二附属医院检验科

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2015年第1期14-16,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘　　要：目的：2种方法检测尿液红细胞的对比分析。方法：对25212例患者尿液标本用迪瑞FUS－2000全自动尿沉渣分析仪（简称FUS－2000）及显微镜分别进行红细胞（ RBC）检测，用FUS－2000检测的每份标本均进行图像审核，记录图像审核前后RBC阳性例数。结果：FUS－2000检测RBC图像审核前阳性率48．5％，图像审核后阳性率20．8％，显微镜法检测阳性率20．3％；FUS－2000图像审核前与显微镜检查的符合率为71．8％，图像审核后与显微镜检查的符合率为99．4％。结论：受各种因素干扰，FUS－2000在检测RBC时必须进行图像审核以减少误判，但即使图像审核后也不能完全替代显微镜检查，对于异常难辨认的标本要以显微镜法进行确认。Objective：To evaluate contrast analysis of two different ways of erythrocyte testing in urine.Methods：A total of 25212 sam-ples were detected by FUS-2000 analyzer and microscope respectively to test erythrocyte .Every samples detected by FUS-2000 analyzer must be amended by image and erythrocyte positive results were counted before and after image amendment .Results：The positive rate was 48.5%and 20.8%before and after image amendment and The positive rate of microscope examination was 20.3%.Coincidence rate of image amendment and microscope examination was 99.4%,but this rate of non-amendment and microscope examination was 71.8%. Conclusion：The image amendment was necessary when erythrocyte detected by FUS-2000 because of many effect factors.And the manu-al microscopy should be used for abnormal illegible cases.

关 键 词：红细胞 FUS-2000尿沉渣分析仪 显微镜检查 对比分析 

分 类 号：R446.12[医药卫生—诊断学]