检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院肿瘤医院内科,北京市100021 [2]中国医学科学院肿瘤医院护理部,北京市100021
出 处:《中国护理管理》2014年第11期1145-1148,共4页Chinese Nursing Management
摘 要:目的 :系统评价水胶体敷料对于PICC患者机械性静脉炎的预防效果。方法 :计算机检索Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews、JBI Database of Systematic Review、EMBase、Pub Med、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和中国学术期刊全文数据库中关于水胶体敷料对于预防PICC患者机械性静脉炎效果的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验(q-RCT),同时筛检纳入文献的参考文献。由2名研究者对文献质量进行严格评价和资料提取,对符合质量标准的RCT进行meta分析。结果 :共纳入9篇文献,meta分析的结果显示水胶体敷料能降低PICC患者机械性静脉炎的发生率。结论 :水胶体敷料的使用对于预防PICC机械性静脉炎的发生具有显著效果,具有一定临床推广意义。Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of hydrocolloid dressing in preventing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related mechanical phlebitis. Methods: The authors searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBI Database of Systematic Review, EMBase, Pub Med, CBMdisc, Wanfang Data and CNKI to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials(q-RCTs) which studied the effects of hydrocolloid dressing in preventing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related mechanical phlebitis. The quality of RCTs and q-RCT were critically appraised and data were extracted by 2 reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted for the eligible RCTs. Results: 9 RCTs were included. The meta-analysis had showed that hydrocolloid dressing could decrease the rate of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related mechanical phlebitis significantly. Conclusion: Hydrocolloid dressing was effective to prevent Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related mechanical phlebitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28