检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(武汉)马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430074 [2]中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,湖北武汉430074 [3]武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《中国国土资源经济》2014年第12期20-22,共3页Natural Resource Economics of China
摘 要:我国作为全球铁矿石的最大进口国,却长期得不到相对应的定价话语权。与之对应的,我国稀土行业也曾一度丧失定价权,但通过限制出口量、限制产量、加强行业整合、规范行业准入等一系列动作,重新夺回定价权。稀土拿到定价权对争取铁矿石定价话语权的启发:(1)铁矿石和稀土一样,在我国都遇到了技术水平不够的问题,突破技术封锁,提高贫铁矿冶炼技术;(2)行业整顿继续深入,提高准入门槛;(3)我国应以稀土换取铁矿石等资源话语权。As one of the world's biggest importer of iron ore, China hasn’t have got the corresponding pricing power for a long time. However, although the rare earth industry in China was once loss of pricing power, and now, the pricing power has been re-gained by restrictions on exports and output, strengthening integration in rare earth industry, and standardizing industry admittance requirements. Following from this, this paper discusses some enlightenments gained from rare earth pricing power for iron ore pricing power, these include: like the situation of rare earth, the technology of iron ore is not mature, so we must break through the blockage of technology, improve the smelting technology of lean ore. And then we must deepen industry regulation, and raise the threshold for access. In addition, we must exchange rare earth for the voice for resources access.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.100.199