检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨存霞[1] 孙瑞华[2] 顾泽龙[1] 黄傲[1] 王雨萌[1] 李欢[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学管理学院,北京100029 [2]中日友好医院科研和学科建设部,北京100029
出 处:《中日友好医院学报》2014年第6期338-340,共3页Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital
摘 要:目的:通过实际应用效果评价中日友好医院自主科研课题结题绩效评估指标体系。方法:应用指标体系评估项目绩效,以绩效评价结果为数据基础,评价可信度、可区分度、相关度,反映指标体系合理性,通过专家离散率评价可信度可区分度的可靠性。结果:指标体系评价项目得分服从正态分布,指标体系可区分度95.44,可信度60.13,计划执行、实际产出、产出预期间无相关性,显示指标体系合理。结论:中日友好医院自主科研课题结题绩效评估指标体系实际应用合理可行。Objective:To assess the feasibihy of the performance evaluating system for scientific research pro- jects supported by China-Japan Friendship Hospital.Methods:The performance of the twelve hospital projects in the conclusion stage was evaluated by applying the system.On the basis of the assessment score,the credi- bility,diseriminant validity and correlation were used to evaluate the rationality of the system.The reliability of credibility and diseriminant validity were assessed by deviation rate of reviewers scores.Results:The scores calculated by index system was normal distribution.The diseriminant validity the credibility of the system were 95.44 and 60.13.No correlation was found among plan execution,actual output,expected output,suggesting the system was reasonable.Conclusion:The performance of evaluating system for evaluating the hospital sup- ported projects in the conclusion stage is reasonable and feasible.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145