法治中国建设视阈下的合议庭制度改革探究  

The Research on the Group-congress System's Reform under Background of Legal China's Construction

作　　者：张彩旗[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《政法论丛》2014年第6期128-135,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国法院审判组织包括审判委员会、合议庭和独任审判员。合议庭制度改革,是每一轮司法改革中都会涉及的领域。但是,由于外部环境和配套机制的制约,合议庭制度改革虽然看上去在不断进行和深化,而实际上总是未能完全实现所追求的独立、公平、民主、专业的让审理者裁判、由裁判者负责的目标,审者不判、判者不审等审判行政化以及合而不议、陪而不审等合议庭形合实独、权责不明等问题依然普遍。因此,如何结合我国法院的改革实践,探讨出一些我国合议庭制度改革的建议就显得尤为重要。In China, Judgment-Organization includes justice-committee, Group-congress and single-justice. Group-congress system＇s reform, which is a field that judicatory reform will refer to during the reform. However, Because of outer surroundings and the given limited systems, Group-congress seems to be going on and further devel- opment. As a matter of fact, it does not come true the goals of independence, fair and democracy. At the same time, it dose not really give the judicature a chance to judge properly. And the judicature is not responsible for it. Therefore, there are still some problems during the reform. So the cognizance can not hand down a verdict. And the sentence cant not give some cognizance, and there is no clear limit between the justice rights and the responsibilities of handing a case. The thesis will come up with some advice on Group-congress System＇ s Reform according to some practice of the count of justice in China.

关 键 词：合议庭改革 审判权 办案责任 

分 类 号：DF82[政治法律—法学]