检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国网能源研究院,北京102209
出 处:《商业研究》2015年第1期15-22,52,共9页Commercial Research
摘 要:由于环境问题的外部性和资源的稀缺性,政府投入已经成为我国当前环境污染治理的主要资金来源。在新古典经济学分析框架下,本文分析说明经济发展与环境达到和谐共存的状态需要政府干预,而经济与环境和谐发展是新古典经济学框架下的一条次优路径;利用省际面板数据的实证分析结果表明,我国环境污染治理效果并不明显,各个省份基本上位于环境库茨涅茨曲线的左边,总体上处于"边发展、边污染"状态,社会总资本进入环境改善活动的比例过低,达不到在经济发展过程中改善环境的目标。The governmental expenditure is the most important part of the whole capitals in managing environmental pol-lution because of externalities of environmental problems and scarcity of resources.This article thinks that the government intervention is essential to realize the harmonious situation under neoclassical economics theory, and the harmonious de-velopment path of economic growth and environment is a suboptimal path under neoclassical economics theory.It will use the panel data to certify the theoretical conclusion.Empirical results show that, the effect of environmental pollution con-trol in our country is not obvious, generally in the state of“while development, while pollution”, the total social capital to enter the environmental improvement activity ratio is too low, which cannot realize the goal of improving environment in the economic development process.
分 类 号:F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3