反垄断法合理原则对美国职业球队迁离的规制  

On the Regulation of the Rule of Reason Analysis for the Movement of Professional Sports Teams in the U.S.Antitrust Law

作　　者：张敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《浙江体育科学》2015年第1期24-28,60,共6页Zhejiang Sport Science

基　　金：教育部2014年人文社会科学项目"大学基金会投资行为的法律规制"(14YJC820076);上海市高校一流学科(法学)建设计划(经济法学科)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：就限制职业球队迁离引发的反垄断诉讼,美国法院在适用《谢尔曼法》时形成了合理原则,在判例中确立了职棒大联盟的单一实体身份,进而使其获得反垄断法上的豁免地位,而其他联盟并不构成单一实体。在适用合理原则时,法院应考虑限制球队迁离举措对竞争的正反效应,考量人口规模、经济前景、便利设施和地区平衡等因素。With the exception of MLB,leagues have been vulnerable to these antitrust suits,as courts have found their restriction on movement to be an unreasonable restraint of trade under the Sherman Act.the Court continues its refusal to recognize other professional leagues as single entities.The court even go so far as to offer suggestions of factors that leagues could consider to help bring the rules into compliance：population,economic projections,facilities,and regional balance.

关 键 词：职业体育 反垄断法 球队迁离 

分 类 号：DF419.9[政治法律—经济法学]