检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓艳君[1]
出 处:《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期124-128,共5页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:湖南省教育科学十二五规划立项课题(XJKO11BZJO30)
摘 要:目前,在校大学生兼职普遍,维权颇为艰难。究其根源,在于我国劳动立法至今没有对"劳动者"进行明确界定,导致保护不周。兼职大学生完全具备劳动者主体资格,理应纳入劳动法调整范围。当务之急,可以司法解释或规章形式明确大学生兼职的法律性质,同时通过地方立法弥补不足。长久之计,则需完善劳动立法,扩张解释劳动者概念,对在不同劳动力配置模式下从事劳动给付的人,给予劳动者应该得到的法律保护,从而扩大法律保障非全日制劳动者的范围。Nowadays,it is a common phenomenon that college students take part-time jobs.However,the students' right is hard to defend when trouble occurs,which is caused originally by the vague definition of the Laborer set by the legislation in China.This paper holds the opinion that those students taking part-time jobs should be considered in the Labor Law because they have the full subject qualification of being a laborer.Thus,it is high time to definitude the legal qualification of students taking part-time jobs by judicial interpretation or regulations.In the long run,it is to improve the legislation of labor and elucidate the definition of laborer that one should be in the protection of the law if he works in different labor allocation models and as a result,the legal right of more part-timers will be well defended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.83.23