检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院,广东广州510095
出 处:《中国医药指南》2014年第34期12-13,15,共3页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨延续护理干预对直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者生存质量及预后的影响。方法选取接受永久性肠造口的直肠癌患者128例,随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组患者出院后接受延续护理,对照组只接受常规出院护理指导。比较两组患者出院6个月后造口自我护理能力及造口相关知识掌握程度、生存质量及肠造口并发症的差异。结果干预组患者出院6个月后在造口自我护理能力、造口相关知识掌握程度、生存质量均高于对照组(P<0.05),肠造口并发症的总发生率低于对照组(P<0.01),术后随访6个月两组患者累积无造口不良事件生存率差异有统计学意义(91.9%vs 63.8%,P=0.001)。结论延续护理干预可促进永久性肠造口患者掌握造口护理知识、提升自我护理能力,提高患者的生存质量并减少肠造口并发症的发生,是行之有效的干预方法。Objective To investigate the effects of transitional nursing care on quality of life and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after ostomy. Methods 128 rectal cancer patients treated with miles operations in our hospital were enrolled and randomly divide into two groups: control group and experimental group in which patients accept transitional nursing care after discharged from hospital. Self-nursing ability, proficiency in nursing knowledge about ostomy, quality of life (QOL) scores and ostomy complications in patients 6 months after discharged from hospital were measured and compared between two groups. Results The intervention group were discharged from hospital six months after the stoma self-care, ostomy related knowledge level of quality of life were higher (P〈0.05), the overall incidence of intestinal stoma complications than the control group (P〈0.01), and were followed up for 6 months cumulative adverse no stoma patients were event-free survival difference was statistically significant (91.9% vs 63.8%, P=0.001). Conclusions Transitional nursing care can promote patients nursing knowledge about ostomy, increase their self-care ability and QOL, and reduce incidence rate of ostomy complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229